$10,000 for rooftop solar? No, thanks. Why homeowners are rejecting an Ontario rebate that ‘doesn’t make any sense’

When Peter Leiss decided to get solar panels and a battery installed, he could have put in the paperwork to qualify for a $10,000 rebate from the provincial government.
That’s because Leiss says the rebate comes with a catch that makes it impossible to accept.
“If we had taken the rebate, all the excess power that’s produced goes into the grid and you don’t get any credit for it,” he said. “It doesn’t make any sense.”
Leiss isn’t alone. Despite shelling out tens of thousands of dollars to generate clean electricity, most people installing solar panels and batteries are turning down the government subsidy, the Star has learned.
“For probably 95 percent of our clients, it’s actually not a good option,” said Beau Badore, owner of solar panel installer Heliotechnik. Homeowners, he says, will pay off their system more quickly by turning down the rebate and getting paid for their excess power.
Restricting the rebate in such a way not only discourages folks from installing solar, experts say, it also hampers society from reaping the benefits: more emissions-free electricity and lower bills.
Ontario is the only province that makes people choose. Other provinces not only allow homeowners to receive a government rebate and sell their solar generation into the grid, many require it in order to capture the full value of the technology.
Solar power has been hailed as the cheapest form of energy in history , is being installed on rooftops around the world and can push power into the grid to alleviate bottlenecks, avoiding costly grid upgrades and keeping power bills down for everyone. In the U.K. and Australia, solar is flooding grids with so much energy, it has led to utilities offering free electricity . But experts say these benefits only work if those with solar panels are incentivized to share their power.
“This is a huge missed opportunity,” said Badore.
Internal Ministry of Energy documents, obtained via access-to-information legislation, show that the province was warned that taking away the ability of solar panel owners to sell their power would “significantly limit the uptake of residential solar PV systems.”
An internal analysis found that payback periods for solar installations would almost double without “net metering,” which pays households for exported energy with credits that offset their power bills.
The payback period for a non-exporting solar system would be between 30 and 40 years or “higher than its economic useful life of 25 years,” the government analysis found. Net metering reduces that payback time to 23-29 years, while allowing system owners to both take the rebate and export energy reduces the payback time to 17-22 years.
Adding a battery makes the rule even worse for homeowners, pushing up the payback period to 73 to 100+ years with the rebate alone. If homeowners could claim both incentives, that would come down to 26 years, the analysis found.
These lengthy payback timelines mean installers might suggest their customers not sign up for the rebate “since (net metering) offers a better business case,” the analysis found.
The ministry still ended up recommending the either/or approach, because it considered allowing both to be “double-dipping of government incentives,” the documents state.
“Our government launched the largest energy efficiency framework in Canadian history, offering rebates of up to $10,000 for households through the Home Renovation Savings Program to lower costs while supporting the adoption of (small scale generation like rooftop solar),” said Noah Mawji, spokesperson for Ontario Energy Minister Stephen Lecce, in an emailed statement.
The province has taken steps to reduce barriers and support smarter planning for these small power producers, “as part of an all-of-the-above approach to meet rising energy demand while keeping electricity affordable,” he wrote.
Combining the rebate and net metering was allowed in Ontario until 2024, when the Home Efficiency Rebate+ program abruptly stopped taking new applications . Since January 2025, when the new Home Renovation Savings Program was launched, only 339 people have received a solar panel and/or battery rebate, said the Independent Electricity System Operator, which helps administer the program. There is no tally of the total number of solar projects installed province-wide during that time, but installers estimate only one in 10 customers opt for the rebate.
The problem with the program
Forcing people to choose transforms a policy that ostensibly encourages rooftop solar into one that limits its adoption and stifles its benefits, experts say.
“If you are not net metered, your system is only useful for you,” said Phil McKay, senior director of member programs at the Canadian Renewable Energy Association. “So you get a smaller system and there’s less power for your neighbours.”
Typically, rooftop solar produces electricity that’s used first to power the home or business it sits upon. Excess power can be fed into a battery and stored for later — when the sun goes down — or exported into the grid for others to use.
This benefits the owner by reducing their power bill, but it also benefits the grid both right away and over the long term.
Because solar panels produce most during midday hours, they reduce the need for expensive natural gas generation at peak times, reducing the cost of electricity for everyone. Over the long term, rooftop solar can save the power system from having to make costly upgrades to transmission lines because it produces power where it is used, replacing the power that would otherwise have to be delivered over long distances.
A recent study by Clean Energy Canada quantified those savings and found that rooftop solar, combined with smart thermostats, home batteries and two-way EV chargers, could save utilities and ratepayers $3.5 billion over the next 20 years.
The case for solar in Ontario
As Canada and the world grapple with a massive increase in electricity demand to power data centres, EVs and heat pumps, “we’re going to need any power we can get,” said McKay.
Ontario projects that electricity demand could increase by 90 per cent over the next 25 years.
“Solar is rock solid. You pay once for the device, and you’ve got a fixed price for the energy it will be producing for 20 plus years,” he said. “And, of course, you’ve got all the climate benefits of displacing fossil fuel generation.”
The City of Toronto has set a goal to get 50 per cent of its power from renewable or low-carbon sources by 2030 and 75 per cent by 2050. “Solar will play a significant role,” the city states in its TransformTO strategy.
They get free electricity to run AC and charge EVs. Why is Canada missing out?
Currently, Ontario’s installed grid capacity is six per cent solar, the vast majority of which is small-scale and rooftop.
This trails many countries around the world, including relatively cold and rainy ones like the U.K., where solar doesn’t work as well, yet makes up 20 per cent of the grid, according to statistics compiled by Ember , a clean energy think tank. World leaders include China, which has 32 per cent solar, Australia, where 40 per cent of homes have rooftop solar, and Hungary, which has a national grid where solar makes up 49 per cent of all generating capacity.
At a time when wars are driving up the costs of fossil fuels, solar provides long-term reliable power at a stable and predictable price — all without making climate change worse, said Bobby MacCannell, owner of solar installer Brightworks Energy.
“What’s more reliable in life than death, taxes and the sun coming up in the morning?” he said. “Solar is the quickest, cheapest route to generation with minimal maintenance and a long lifespan.”
These benefits are hidden from the public by “artificially low power rates,” he said, referring to the $7 billion the province spends each year to subsidize power bills .
Getting panels onto roofs has been a slow process, according to Toronto Hydro statistics. Since a high of 322 installations in 2018, the city has not been able to keep the pace up, with only 82 rooftop systems installed in the first 9 months of this year. In a city of three million people, only 3,014 rooftops have solar.
Berlin, Germany, which is further north than Toronto and receives less sunlight, has more than 53,000 rooftop solar systems, up from only 15,000 in 2023, according to a local government report .
Toronto’s home solar accelerator project , run by the Atmospheric Fund, helps homeowners navigate the bureaucracy, permitting and jargon by providing a one-stop shop and a concierge from the beginning to the end of solar panel installation.
But early results show that while the program has increased interest, that hasn’t converted into actual panels on roofs. More than 600 people have signed up, but only 30 have gotten quotes and 10 have installed panels this year, said Chris Caners, director of clean electrification at TAF, which funds projects in the GTA and Hamilton area.
“This can’t be so hard that people get frustrated and give up,” he said. “Let’s incentivize uptake, not make the economics worse.”
Marco Chown Oved is a Toronto-based climate change reporter for the Star. Reach him via email: [email protected] .
Frequently asked questions
Why are Ontario homeowners rejecting the $10,000 provincial solar rebate despite the significant financial incentive offered by the government?
Homeowners reject the rebate because it requires surrendering all excess power to the grid without receiving any credit for it. This condition makes the subsidy economically unviable compared to retaining net metering benefits.
What specific percentage of Heliotechnik clients does owner Beau Badore say find the Ontario solar rebate a poor financial option for their installations?
Beau Badore states that for probably 95 percent of his clients, the rebate is not a good option. He explains that turning down the subsidy allows homeowners to pay off their systems more quickly by getting paid for excess power.
How does the Ontario rebate structure impact the size of solar systems installed and the broader benefits for the provincial power grid?
The rebate structure discourages larger installations because non-net-metered systems are only useful for the owner, leading to smaller systems and less power fed into the grid. This limits the potential for emissions-free electricity and lower bills for society.