Pvola

Editorial policy

Last updated 8 November 2026

Sourcing and attribution

Pvola reports on information published by public sources such as industry publications, companies, governments and research institutions. Each article identifies its original source in the Source block and stores that URL as structured isBasedOn data.

We do not fabricate quotes, figures or named sources. Where a fact cannot be traced to the cited source, it should not be published; corrections are handled under the process below.

Editorial workflow and AI-assisted tools

Every article is reviewed by an editor before publication. Editors select stories, check key figures against the cited primary source, and are responsible for headlines, framing and corrections.

We use AI-assisted tools for translation, source monitoring and structured metadata. These tools speed up the workflow but do not make publication decisions. Automated tools can still produce errors; when we find one, we correct it and update the article.

Where we add a judgement about what a development means for developers, investors, installers or off-takers, it appears in a clearly labelled “Pvola take” block. Key facts are presented as short, source-grounded statements.

Independence

Pvola does not accept payment for coverage. Articles are not sponsored, and commercial relationships do not determine which stories we publish or how we describe them. Nothing on Pvola is investment, legal or engineering advice.

Corrections and updates

When we find an error, we correct it promptly. Substantive corrections may be noted in the article. To request a correction, email [email protected] with the article URL and supporting source.

Contact

Questions about this policy can be sent to[email protected].